2016 GCGC
CONFERENCE: Stockholm

10-11 June 2016

Three Ages of Bankruptcy

Speaker:

Mark Roe

David Burg Professor of Law

Discussant:

Hideki Kanda

Emeritus Professor

Abstract:

During the past century, three decisionmaking systems have arisen to accomplish a bankruptcy restructuring restructuring—judicial administration, a deal among the firm’s dominant players, and a sale of the firm’s operations in their entirety. Each is embedded in the Bankruptcy Code today, with all having been in play for more than a century and with each having had its heyday—its dominant age.

The shifts, rises, and falls among decisionmaking systems have previously been explained by successful evolution in bankruptcy thinking, by the happenstance of the interests and views of lawyers that designed bankruptcy changes, and by the interests of those who influenced decisionmakers. Here I argue that these broad changes also stem from baseline market capacities, which shifted greatly over the past century; I build the case for shifts underlying market conditions being a major explanation for the shifts in decisionmaking modes.

Keeping these three alternative decisionmaking types clearly in mind not only leads to better understanding of what bankruptcy can and cannot do, but also facilitates stronger policy decisions today here and in the world’s differing bankruptcy systems, as some tasks are best left to the market, others are best handled by the courts, and still others can be left to the inside parties to resolve.


Visit our partner site :footer-logo-new

CONTACT US

We're not around right now. But you can send us an email and we'll get back to you, asap.

Sending
Designed By Astwood

Log in with your credentials

Forgot your details?